Political scientists debate the Montana experiment

Following Melissa Michelson’s post over the weekend, here are a range of views about the Montana experiment, from defense to condemnation.

All links and posts at The New West reflect the opinions of the authors only; they do not represent the opinions of the Western Political Science Association as an organization.

Paul Gronke of Reed College on the study’s ethical shortcomings

Benjamin Lauderdale of LSE proposes a “thought experiment”

Chris Blattman of Columbia University explores the relationship between research and real-world outcomes.

Thomas Leeper defends the experiment

John Patty explains the tradeoffs and gains of social science research


2 thoughts on “Political scientists debate the Montana experiment

  1. Pingback: The Ethics of Intervention | Tom Pepinsky

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s